Robin Padilla, dinepensahan ang sinabi ni Mariel na nakapagpasa ng batas si Robin mula sa bilibid
- Senator Robin Padilla defended his wife, Mariel Padilla, over her resurfaced 2022 remarks about his imprisonment and the passage of a law in 1997
- Robin argued that although he was not yet a politician at the time, public attention surrounding his imprisonment helped highlight concerns over penalties imposed under a martial law-era decree
- He compared the situation to the later Eddie Garcia Law, saying a person does not have to be the author or sponsor of legislation for their circumstances to become associated with a law
- The senator maintained that his imprisonment helped bring attention to the plight of detainees and insisted that the experience ultimately benefited many people
PAY ATTENTION: stay informed and follow us on Google News!
Senator Robin Padilla has come to the defense of his wife, Mariel Padilla, after her 2022 remarks resurfaced regarding his imprisonment in the 1990s and the eventual passage of Republic Act No. 8294 in 1997.
Source: Facebook
Mariel’s previous comments drew renewed attention after she argued that Robin’s imprisonment had contributed to circumstances that eventually led to the passage of the law, decades before he entered politics.
In a statement addressing the issue, Robin explained his interpretation of the events and defended his wife’s point.
Padilla compared the situation to Republic Act No. 11996, popularly known as the Eddie Garcia Law, which was enacted following the death of veteran actor Eddie Garcia and addresses occupational safety and health protections for workers in the film, television, and theater industries.
Like and share our Facebook posts to support the KAMI team! Share your thoughts in the comments. We love reading them!
According to Robin, Garcia did not become a lawmaker or serve as the author and sponsor of the legislation simply because the law bears his name. Rather, he said, Garcia’s death became a catalyst that helped draw public attention to conditions affecting entertainment workers.
He argued that a similar principle applied to his own experience.
Robin pointed to RA 8294, which was approved on June 6, 1997, and amended provisions of Presidential Decree No. 1866 concerning unlawful possession, manufacture, acquisition, disposition, and dealing in firearms and ammunition. Official legislative records confirm that RA 8294 was enacted by the 10th Congress and was intended to amend the martial law-era decree.
Padilla said public reaction to his imprisonment helped expose what he described as harsh consequences under PD 1866. He credited then-Senator Ramon Revilla Sr. and then-Congressman Raul Daza with using the public reaction surrounding his case to push greater attention toward the issue.
“Hindi pa man siya senador noon, ngunit dahil sa kanyang pagkakakulong pumasa ang batas,” Padilla said in defending the argument.
He further claimed that the law benefited hundreds or thousands of people who had been detained under the previous legal framework, particularly those facing penalties related to illegal firearm possession.
The senator stressed that his point was not that he personally sat in Congress and authored the measure. Instead, he argued that his case became part of the circumstances that helped generate public attention and legislative action.
“Malinaw po yan sa sikat ng araw na hindi pa ako senador ay nakapagpasa na ako ng batas,” he said.
Padilla also pushed back at critics whom he accused of dismissing the argument because of political hostility or personal dislike.
He ended his statement by invoking his faith, saying that the experience demonstrated how God can work through unexpected circumstances.
Sana po ay naging malinaw ito sa mga "sobrang matatalino" na hindi na makapag-isip nang maayos dahil sa kanilang inggit at paninira.
hundreds and thousands po daw ang natulungan ko at matutulungan pa dahil sa isinakripisyo ko,
God works in mysterious ways!”
Padilla’s defense therefore centers on the argument that his wife’s 2022 remarks should be understood as describing the broader impact of his case, rather than claiming that he literally served as a legislator or formally authored the law.
Robin Padilla became famous in Philippine cinema as the “Bad Boy,” appearing in major action films such as Anak ni Baby Ama and Bad Boy. He later entered politics and transitioned from entertainment into public service. In the 2022 Philippine Senate elections, he received the highest number of votes among the senatorial candidates and secured a seat in the Senate. He currently serves as a senator and heads the Committee on Cultural Communities and Muslim Affairs.
Previously, Senator Robin Padilla explained his decision to skip President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr.’s fifth State of the Nation Address. The senator said his absence was influenced by both his personal respect for the president and the political circumstances surrounding the event.
In another report, Robin Padilla addressed Angel Locsin’s criticism during a recent radio interview. He said that he and his wife, Mariel Rodriguez-Padilla, deliberately chose not to answer the actress publicly because they believed she could have been dealing with personal difficulties at the time. Robin maintained that he still regards Angel as a friend and said he remains open to communicating with her should she want to discuss the matter.
Bagong feature: Tingnan ang mga balitang para sa'yo ➡️ hanapin ang "Recommended for you" block at mag-enjoy!
Source: KAMI.com.gh
