House Panel finds impeachment complaints against PBBM lacking in substance
- The House Committee on Justice voted unanimously to dismiss all impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr
- Lawmakers ruled that the allegations were "insufficient in substance," citing a lack of credible evidence and legal weight
- The decision effectively prevents the impeachment process from reaching the plenary, securing a major political win for the administration
- Administration allies emphasized that the dismissal ensures national stability and allows the government to focus on economic growth
Narito na ang paghahanap sa KAMI! Basahin ang mga balita tungkol sa iyong paboritong mga bituin sa pamamagitan lamang ng pag-type ng kanilang pangalan sa search bar!
In a decisive legislative session on February 4, 2026, the House Committee on Justice of the Philippines officially dismissed all impeachment complaints filed against President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr.
Source: Youtube
The committee, voting overwhelmingly in favor of the President, ruled that the allegations presented were "insufficient in substance," effectively halting the legal attempt to remove the Chief Executive from office.
The proceedings focused on whether the complaints contained enough factual evidence and legal grounds to proceed to a full trial.
After hours of deliberation and scrutiny of the documents submitted by the complainants, the committee members concluded that the arguments lacked the necessary weight required by the Constitution.
Like and share our Facebook posts to support the KAMI team! Share your thoughts in the comments. We love reading them!
Presiding over the hearing, the Committee Chairperson emphasized that an impeachment is a serious political and legal process that should not be used lightly.
"The substance of the complaint must be clear and supported by credible evidence. In this instance, the committee found that the threshold for substance was not met," the panel noted in its final resolution.
The voting results reflected a strong sense of unity within the lower house, as members from various political blocs voiced their support for dismissing the complaints.
Lawmakers argued that the charges were based on hearsay or lacked direct links to the President’s official actions.
By voting the complaints insufficient in substance, the committee has effectively blocked the cases from reaching the House floor for a plenary vote.
Under Philippine law, once a committee dismisses a complaint for lack of substance, the process ends there, providing President Marcos with a significant political victory and allowing the administration to refocus on its legislative agenda.
Supporters of the administration welcomed the decision, stating that the dismissal ensures political stability and prevents unnecessary distractions from the country's economic recovery efforts.
They maintained that the complaints were politically motivated and lacked legal merit from the start.
Conversely, the groups behind the impeachment expressed disappointment, claiming that they were not given enough opportunity to present more exhaustive documentation.
Despite the setback, they vowed to remain vigilant in their role as critics of the administration.
With this hurdle cleared, the Marcos administration enters the mid-term season with a reinforced mandate from the legislative branch.
Meanwhile, in a previous related news, Senator Imee Marcos has formally questioned the decision of her brother, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., regarding the selection of Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin “Boying” Remulla as the nation’s next Ombudsman. The senator described the appointment as a third-tier strategy, labeling previous initiatives as failures and suggesting this move is a calculated backup plan. Highlighting deep political tensions, Senator Marcos expressed specific fears for the safety of Vice President Sara Duterte following this change in the anti-graft office’s leadership. Imee emphasized the need for a truly independent "People’s Ombudsman," arguing that the position requires a leader who commands absolute public trust rather than being a political ally.
It can be recalled that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. has officially moved Justice Secretary Boying Remulla from the Department of Justice to lead the Office of the Ombudsman. Remulla steps into the vacancy left by Samuel Martires, whose seven-year mandate concluded in late July, marking a new chapter for the constitutional body. The Presidential Communications Office stated that the new appointee is tasked with intensifying the government's anti-corruption drive through improved transparency and rigorous accountability. Upon announcing the move, the President reiterated that his administration’s goal remains the impartial application of the law, ensuring that public office continues to be treated as a public trust.
Bagong feature: Tingnan ang mga balitang para sa'yo ➡️ hanapin ang "Recommended for you" block at mag-enjoy!
Source: KAMI.com.gh
