Driver, pinagpapaliwanag ng LTO ukol sa aso na nilagay niya sa trunk ng kotse
- A motorist is in hot water after he was seen transporting a dog inside his car trunk
- Another motorist was able to capture a video of the dog inside the half-closed car trunk, sparking public outrage and animal welfare concerns
- The Land Transportation Office (LTO) is also demanding an explanation from the vehicle owner and is currently investigating the incident following the following online circulation of the controversial video
- Netizens have condemned the act as animal cruelty with many questioning the inhumane treatment of the canine
Narito na ang paghahanap sa KAMI! Basahin ang mga balita tungkol sa iyong paboritong mga bituin sa pamamagitan lamang ng pag-type ng kanilang pangalan sa search bar!
A motorist found himself in hot water after he was seen transporting a dog sitting inside the trunk of his car.

Source: UGC
Another motorist captured the harrowing moment on video as the dog, seemingly confused and afraid, looked around it while sitting inside a half-closed car trunk.
The video has since then sparked public outrage with many expressing their concern for the animal.
The Land Transportation Office (LTO) has also reportedly launched an inquiry into a motorist who was captured on video with a dog inside the trunk of a car.
Like and share our Facebook posts to support the KAMI team! Share your thoughts in the comments. We love reading them!
The video, which has spread online, prompted the LTO to seek an explanation from the vehicle owner regarding the potentially harmful and inhumane method of transporting the animal.
The specific location and time of the incident remain unconfirmed within the provided text.
However, the visual evidence has triggered a wave of criticism, with many netizens expressing their disapproval of the motorist's actions and raising concerns about the dog's safety and well-being, especially considering the prevailing hot weather conditions.
Comments on the social media post reflecting the news highlighted the perceived cruelty of confining an animal in such a manner.
One user questioned why the dog wasn’t placed inside the car, even suggesting the use of a cage or muzzle if the animal was prone to biting.
Another commenter speculated that the dog might have been a recent rescue, implying a lack of proper transportation.
However, this was countered by others who argued that rescuing an animal without the means to transport it safely was irresponsible, suggesting alternatives like contacting animal control.
Several comments directly condemned the act as potential animal cruelty. One user expressed relief that a concerned rider had apparently followed the vehicle and reprimanded the driver, implying that the intervention might have prevented a worse outcome for the dog.
Another commenter sarcastically suggested that the driver should experience being confined in a car trunk to understand the dog’s ordeal.
The prevailing sentiment among the online commenters was one of condemnation for the motorist’s actions and a strong call for accountability.
Many urged the LTO to take appropriate action, with some even suggesting charges of animal cruelty should be filed.
There was also a demand for the motorist to provide a public explanation and demonstrate that the dog is currently safe and well.
One particularly critical comment addressed a supposed defender of the driver, questioning how placing a dog in a trunk could be considered acceptable treatment.
The commenter even sarcastically asked if the defender and the driver would tolerate being placed in the trunk of a small car themselves.
The incident underscores the ongoing debate and increasing awareness regarding animal welfare and responsible pet ownership.
The LTO’s decision to investigate suggests a recognition of the public’s concern and the potential violation of animal welfare regulations, even if specific laws weren't explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
The outcome of the LTO’s inquiry and the explanation provided by the motorist will likely be closely watched by the online community and animal welfare organizations.
News, photos or videos that arouse the interest of netizens would often go viral on social media, due to the attention netizens give them. These viral posts appeal to the emotions of netizens, and in rare cases, such could also happen to ordinary people, making them very relatable to just about simply everyone.
Meanwhile in other news, a 6-year-old girl died from severe electric shock when she accidentally touched a metal component of an electrical outlet while attempting to charge her mobile phone. The tragic incident, which happened in Cadiz City in Negros Occidental, highlights household electrical dangers. The father himself witness his daughter’s accidental contact with the outlet’s metal part. The severe electric shock suffered by the 6-year-old girl proved fatal despite efforts by a medical team at the hospital.
Still in other news, a 27-year-old man was arrested by the police in Teresa, Rizal after the parents of a minor, who is allegedly his girlfriend, filed an abuse of a minor case against him. Police authorities say the abuse began in 2019 when the minor was only 13 years old while the man was then 21 years old. The accused allegedly used alcohol and dangerous substances during the initial incident of the abuse. Despite his wrongdoing, the suspect denied using force or intimidation, saying that what happened between them was consensual.
Bagong feature: Tingnan ang mga balitang para sa'yo ➡️ hanapin ang "Recommended for you" block at mag-enjoy!
Source: KAMI.com.gh